U.S. President Donald Trump and his family have apparently made over $1 billion in pre-tax earnings from several cryptocurrency projects, an investigation by the Financial Times has revealed.
Source: Financial Times
Some of Trump Family Crypto Venture projects include the issuance of meme coins like $TRUMP and $MELANIA, USD1 stablecoin issuance, token sales via World Liberty Financial (WLFI), and a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol. To accompany this news is also rising a political, related point.
Let’s understand the capital generated pattern and why these projects have raised ethical concerns? Is Interest and the influence of foreign investors the reasons?
Trump Family Crypto Revenue Breakdown
With multiple revenue streams contributing to this massive $1 billion earning. Key highlights include:
-
Meme Coins ($TRUMP & $MELANIA): These politically-branded tokens, trading at $6.07 and $0.1156 respectively, brought in approximately $427 million, even though both coins have seen sharp price swings since their highs, reflecting broader market volatility.
-
WLFI Token Sales: The decentralized finance platform, valued at $0.1407, added approximately $550 million in revenue, which showed high demand from investors.
-
USD1 Stablecoin ($1.0): Fully regulated and backed by fiat, USD1 transacted $2.71 billion, including an impressive $2 billion investment by an Abu Dhabi company through Binance.
Though these figures are eye-watering, some experts say they probably do not reflect maximum possible market impact due to the brand’s worldwide recognition.
Critics Express Fear of Political Favoritism
Although the Trump family insists that such projects are fair business ventures, critics charge that they will use political leverage to secure better treatment.
The president’s pro-crypto stance, with lowered regulation and support for wider adoption, also raises moral issues regarding transparency and market equity.
Eric Trump’s Proposal Conforms and Its Potential
Source: X
Building on their crypto venture beyond cryptocurrencies, Eric Trump revealed plans to tokenize real estate properties under WLFI and USD1 infrastructure. The structure would allow investors to buy fractional ownership of value buildings, where one could pay as low as $1,000 for an ownership share and perks like hotel access or reserved entry.
Initiatives like that will work as an enhancing tool in the ongoing capital rise. It also lays out that the firm’s owners are not limited to only crypto or only traditional markets, they are applying the theory of mix-culture in financial terms.
In Final View
The Trump-family backed ventures show how political authority, branding, and blockchain may come together to drive record economic activity. Of concern from an ethical and regulatory standpoint, the ventures show how there is increasing mainstream adoption of stablecoins, DeFi, and tokenized assets across the globe.
While U.S. regulators continue to keep an eye on crypto projects, ventures such as WLFI and USD1 can be regarded as early signs of how blockchain innovation meets traditional assets and political authorities.
It also poses a question, Could politically-supported projects such as this create a movement of similar initiatives? And are regulators ready to respond to possible systemic risks if take-up increases quickly?
